Scalable consistency checking between diagrams - The VIEWINTEGRA approach

45Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The Unified Modeling Language (UML) supports a wide range of diagrams for modeling software development concerns. UML diagrams are independent but connected; their meta-model describes them under a common roof. Despite the advances of UML, we found that the problem of ensuring consistency between UML diagrams has not been solved. In the past years, we have developed an approach for automated consistency checking, called VIEWINTEGRA. Our approach provides excellent support for active (preventive) and passive (detective) consistency checking. We make use of consistent transformation to translate diagrams into interpretations and we use consistency comparison to compare those interpretations to other diagrams. Our approach was applied to a number of applications where we found the separation of transformation and comparison to be highly beneficial in addressing consistency-checking scalability & usability issues. This paper introduces our UML-based transformation framework, discusses how it aids comparison, and demonstrates how it improves consistency checking.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Egyed, A. (2001). Scalable consistency checking between diagrams - The VIEWINTEGRA approach. In Proceedings - 16th Annual International Conference on Automated Software Engineering, ASE 2001 (pp. 387–390). Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. https://doi.org/10.1109/ASE.2001.989835

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free