Semantic epistemology: A brief response to Devitt

15Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In this article, I argue that philosophers' intuitions about reference are not more reliable than lay people's and that intuitions about the reference of proper names and uses of proper names provide equally good evidence for theories of reference.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Machery, E. (2012). Semantic epistemology: A brief response to Devitt. Theoria (Spain). https://doi.org/10.1387/theoria.6223

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free