The single unit, single retainer, cantilever resin-bonded bridge.

  • P B
  • S D
  • K B
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Resin-bonded restorations have many advantages over conventional alternatives. Advances in adhesive technology together with a better understanding of the clinical function of such restorations have allowed resin-bonded bridges to play an important role in everyday clinical practice. This paper highlights the role and importance of the single abutment, single pontic cantilever resin-bonded bridge. Clinical experience might suggest that the cantilever design offers a viable alternative to other designs. Furthermore, the paper suggests that when cantilever resin-bonded bridges fail initially, re-bond often leads to predictable long-term success. Factors such as patient selection, abutment preparation, retainer design and the aesthetic limitations of resin-bonded bridges are also discussed. The authors can claim that further clinical studies are necessary to identify exactly what factors influence the success of cantilever and other resin-bonded designs.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

P, B., S, D., & K, B. (1996). The single unit, single retainer, cantilever resin-bonded bridge. British Dental Journal, 181(10), 373–379. Retrieved from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8979413/

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free