Social construction as grounding; or: fundamentality for feminists, a reply to Barnes and Mikkola

36Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Feminist metaphysics is guided by the insight that gender is socially constructed, yet the metaphysics behind social construction remains obscure. Barnes and Mikkola charge that current metaphysical frameworks—including my grounding framework—are hostile to feminist metaphysics. I argue that not only is a grounding framework hospitable to feminist metaphysics, but also that a grounding framework can help shed light on the metaphysics behind social construction. By treating social construction claims as grounding claims, the feminist metaphysician and the social ontologist both gain a way to integrate social construction claims into a general metaphysics, while accounting for the inferential connections between social construction and attendant notions such as dependence and explanation. So I conclude that a grounding framework can be helpful for feminist metaphysics and social ontology.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Schaffer, J. (2017). Social construction as grounding; or: fundamentality for feminists, a reply to Barnes and Mikkola. Philosophical Studies, 174(10), 2449–2465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-016-0738-8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free