Strain, Negative Emotions, and Deviant Coping among African Americans: A Test of General Strain Theory

256Citations
Citations of this article
95Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Although previous research on Agnew's (1992) general strain theory (GST) tends to yield significant effects of strain on negative emotions as well as deviance and crime, results tend to be mixed with regard to (1) the effects of negative emotions on deviance and crime and (2) conditioning factors that Agnew suggests affect the selection of coping strategies. To address these issues, we test hypotheses, derived from GST, about the relationships among strain, negative emotions, and deviant coping by analyzing data from a nationally representative sample of African American adults. Ordinary least squares regression results generally support our hypotheses. First, fully mediating the effects of strain on deviant coping, negative emotions have consistently significant effects on deviance, regardless of whether we use composite or separate measures of inner- and outer-directed emotions and deviance. Interestingly, as hypothesized, the same-directed effects of negative emotions on deviant coping are larger than the opposite-directed ones. Second, while self-esteem and self-efficacy as conditioning factors generally fail to receive empirical support, religiosity is found to significantly buffer the effects of negative emotions on deviance. Implications of our findings for further development of GST are discussed.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jang, S. J., & Johnson, B. R. (2003). Strain, Negative Emotions, and Deviant Coping among African Americans: A Test of General Strain Theory. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 19(1), 79–105. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022570729068

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free