Sign up & Download
Sign in

Where to Stop Reading a Ranked List?

by Avi Arampatzis, Jaap Kamps, Stephen Robertson
Proceedings of the 32nd international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval SIGIR 09 (2009)

Abstract

Ranked retrieval has a particular disadvantage in comparison with traditional Boolean retrieval: there is no clear cut-off point where to stop consulting results. This is a serious problem in some setups. We investigate and further develop methods to select the rank cut-off value which optimizes a given effectiveness measure. Assuming no other input than a system's output for a query-document scores and their distribution-the task is essentially a score-distributional threshold optimization problem. The recent trend in modeling score distributions is to use a normal-exponential mixture: normal for relevant, and exponential for non-relevant document scores. We discuss the two main theoretical problems with the current model, support incompatibility and non-convexity, and develop new models that address them. The main contributions of the paper are two truncated normal-exponential models, varying in the way the out-truncated score ranges are handled. We conduct a range of experiments using the TREC 2007 and 2008 Legal Track data, and show that the truncated models lead to significantly better results.

Cite this document (BETA)

Sign up today - FREE

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research. Learn more

  • All your research in one place
  • Add and import papers easily
  • Access it anywhere, anytime

Start using Mendeley in seconds!

Already have an account? Sign in

Readership Statistics

4 Readers on Mendeley
by Discipline
 
by Academic Status
 
25% Student (Master)
 
25% Post Doc
 
25% Researcher (at a non-Academic Institution)
by Country
 
25% Germany
 
25% Australia
 
25% Ireland