Success and truth in the realism/anti-realism debate

20Citations
Citations of this article
36Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

I aim to clarify the relationship between the success of a theory and the truth of that theory. This has been a central issue in the debates between realists and anti-realists. Realists assume that success is a reliable indicator of truth, but the details about the respects in which success is a reliable indicator or test of truth have been largely left to our intuitions. Lewis (Synthese 129:371-380, 2001) provides a clear proposal of how success and truth might be connected, comparing a test of success of our theories to medical tests with low rates of false positives and false negatives. But, contrary to what Lewis claims, I argue that it is not enough for the realist to undercut the claim that success is not a reliable indicator of truth. Rather, the realist must show that our current best theories are likely true. Further, I argue that tests in science are unlike medical tests in a number of important ways. © 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wray, K. B. (2013). Success and truth in the realism/anti-realism debate. Synthese, 190(9), 1719–1729. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-011-9931-7

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free