The survival of international differences under IFRS: Towards a research agenda

194Citations
Citations of this article
214Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The compulsory use of IFRS for the consolidated statements of listed companies in the EU and elsewhere, and the convergence of IFRS with US GAAP, might imply the end of 'international accounting' as an important field of study. However, there are motives and opportunities for international differences of practice to exist within IFRS usage. Some of the original motives for international accounting differences may still be effective in an IFRS context, though in different ways. The opportunities for different IFRS practices are divided into eight types. Hypotheses relating to each of these are proposed, and some ways of testing them are suggested. Some implications of the existence of different national versions of IFRS are noted.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nobes, C. (2006). The survival of international differences under IFRS: Towards a research agenda. Accounting and Business Research, 36(3), 233–245. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2006.9730023

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free