A textual and philosophical study of the claim that according to ockham there is no synonymy or equivocation in mental language. it is argued that ockham is committed to both claims, either explicitly or in virtue of other features of his doctrine. nevertheless, both claims lead to difficulties for ockham's theory.
CITATION STYLE
Spade, P. V. (1980). Synonymy and Equivocation in Ockham’s Mental Language. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 18(1), 9–22. https://doi.org/10.1353/hph.2008.0355
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.