Tense and truth conditions

4Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The B-theory of time holds that McTaggart's A-series of past, present, and future is reducible to the B-series of events running from earlier to later. According to the date-theory-originally put forth by J. J. C. Smart and later endorsed by by D. H. Mellor-the truth conditions of tensed or Asentence-tokens can be given in terms of tenseless or B-sentences and, therefore, A-sentence-tokens do not ascribe any A-determinations of pastness, presentness, or futurity. However, as Nathan Oaklander has argued, the date-theory does not provide an adequate analysis of the ontological truth conditions of irreducible A-propositions. I show that the co-reporting theory-which holds that for every A-sentence-token there is a B-sentence that differs in sense but reports the same event or state of affairs-escapes the objections Oaklander has addressed against the date-theory. © 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Beer, M. (2010). Tense and truth conditions. Philosophia, 38(2), 265–269. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-009-9213-5

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free