Total brain death: A reply to Alan Shewmon

32Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

D. Alan Shewmon has advanced a well-documented challenge to the widely accepted total brain death criterion for death of the human being. We show that Shewmon's argument against this criterion is unsound, though he does refute the standard argument for that criterion. We advance a distinct argument for the total brain death criterion and answer likely objections. Since human beings are rational animals - sentient organisms of a specific type - the loss of the radical capacity for sentience (the capacity to sense or to develop the capacity to sense) involves a substantial change, the passing away of the human organism. In human beings total brain death involves the complete loss of the radical capacity for sentience, and so in human beings total brain death is death. © 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lee, P., & Grisez, G. (2012, June). Total brain death: A reply to Alan Shewmon. Bioethics. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8519.2010.01846.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free