Translating evidence to practice in the health professions: A randomized trial of Twitter vs Facebook

24Citations
Citations of this article
152Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective: Our objective was to compare the change in research informed knowledge of health professionals and their intended practice following exposure to research information delivered by either Twitter or Facebook. Methods: This open label comparative design study randomized health professional clinicians to receive "practice points" on tendinopathy management via Twitter or Facebook. Evaluated outcomes included knowledge change and self-reported changes to clinical practice. Results: Four hundred and ninety-four participants were randomized to 1 of 2 groups and 317 responders analyzed. Both groups demonstrated improvements in knowledge and reported changes to clinical practice. There was no statistical difference between groups for the outcomes of knowledge change (P=.728), changes to clinical practice (P=.11) or the increased use of research information (P=.89). Practice points were shared more by the Twitter group (P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tunnecliff, J., Weiner, J., Gaida, J. E., Keating, J. L., Morgan, P., Ilic, D., … Maloney, S. (2017). Translating evidence to practice in the health professions: A randomized trial of Twitter vs Facebook. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 24(2), 403–408. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocw085

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free