The Ups and Downs of the Hubble Constant

N/ACitations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

A brief history of the determination of the Hubble constant H0 is given. Early attempts following Lemaître (1927) gave much too high values due to errors of the magnitude scale, Malmquist bias and calibration problems. By 1962 most authors agreed that 75 ≤ H0 ≤ 130. After 1975 a dichotomy arose with values near 100 and others around 55. The former came from apparent-magnitudelimited samples and were affected by Malmquist bias. New distance indicators were introduced; they were sometimes claimed to yield high values of H0, but the most recent data lead to H0 in the 60's, yet with remaining difficulties as to the zero-point of the respective distance indicators. SNe Ia with their large range and very small luminosity dispersion (avoiding Malmquist bias) offer a unique opportunity to determine the large-scale value of H0. Their maximum luminosity can be well calibrated from 10 SNe Ia in local parent galaxies whose Cepheids have been observed with HST. An unforeseen difficulty - affecting all Cepheid distances - is that their P-L relation varies from galaxy to galaxy, presumably in function of metallicity. A proposed solution is summarized here. The conclusion is that H0 = 62.3 ± 1.3 (random) ±5.3 (systematic) on all scales. The expansion age becomes then (with Om = 0.3,OΛ = 0.7) 15.1 Gyr. © 2006 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tammann, G. A. (2008). The Ups and Downs of the Hubble Constant. In Reviews in Modern Astronomy (Vol. 19, pp. 1–29). Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA. https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527619030.ch1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free