Vagueness and arbitrariness: Merricks on composition

8Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In this paper I respond to Trenton Merricks's (2005) paper 'Composition and Vagueness'. I argue that Merricks's paper faces the following difficulty: he claims to provide independent motivation for denying one of the premisses of the Lewis-Sider vagueness argument for unrestricted composition, but the alleged motivation he provides begs the question.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Barnes, E. (2007). Vagueness and arbitrariness: Merricks on composition. Mind, 116(461), 105–113. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/fzm105

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free