Background: Brain imaging is the most common examination in pediatric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), often combined with the use of a gadolinium-based contrast medium. The application of gadolinium-based contrast medium poses some risk. There is limited evidence of the benefits of contrast medium in pediatric brain imaging. Objective: To assess the diagnostic gain of contrast-enhanced sequences in brain MRI when the unenhanced sequences are normal. Materials and methods: We retrospectively assessed 6,683 brain MR examinations using contrast medium in children younger than 16 years in the pediatric radiology department of the University Hospital Leipzig to determine whether contrast-enhanced sequences delivered additional, clinically relevant information to pre-contrast sequences. All examinations were executed using a 1.5-T or a 3-T system. Results: In 8 of 3,003 (95% confidence interval 0.12–0.52%) unenhanced normal brain examinations, a relevant additional finding was detected when contrast medium was administered. Contrast enhancement led to a change in diagnosis in only one of these cases. Conclusion: Children with a normal pre-contrast brain MRI rarely benefit from contrast medium application. Comparing these results to the risks and disadvantages of a routine gadolinium application, there is substantiated numerical evidence for avoiding routine administration of gadolinium in a pre-contrast normal MRI examination.
CITATION STYLE
Dünger, D., Krause, M., Gräfe, D., Merkenschlager, A., Roth, C., & Sorge, I. (2018). Do we need gadolinium-based contrast medium for brain magnetic resonance imaging in children? Pediatric Radiology, 48(6), 858–864. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-017-3999-2
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.