Sign up & Download
Sign in

Whitehead's Revolutionary Concept of Prehension

by Charles Hartshorne
International Philosophical Quarterly (1979)
  • ISSN: 00190365

Abstract

Whitehead is both more pluralistic and more monistic than most british philosophers: more pluralistic for his "many" is not a set of changing individuals but of momentary actualities that become but do not change; more monistic for each actuality "prehends," intuits, Intrinsically relates itself to, Its predecessors. In memory the prehended predecessors are in the same "personal" series as the prehendor, In perception they are not in the same series. Sixteen ways of thinking unfavorable to the acceptance of the concept of prehension are listed and discussed, As are the revolutionary consequences and power of the concept.

Cite this document (BETA)

Sign up today - FREE

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research. Learn more

  • All your research in one place
  • Add and import papers easily
  • Access it anywhere, anytime

Start using Mendeley in seconds!

Already have an account? Sign in

Readership Statistics

2 Readers on Mendeley
by Discipline
 
by Academic Status
 
50% Lecturer
 
50% Senior Lecturer
by Country
 
50% Turkey
 
50% Philippines