In 2005, the National Science Foundation funded a number of projects to study the impact of Hurricane Katrina. The current article provides an overview of several research approaches used to conduct post-Katrina research. Each method had some advantages and disadvantages. The post-disaster context meant that experience from traditional survey methods often did not apply. Comparisons of advantages and disadvantages associated with each sampling method serve to inform future post-disaster research and illuminate the limits of classical research methods. © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008.
CITATION STYLE
Henderson, T. L., Sirois, M., Chen, A. C. C., Airriess, C., Swanson, D. A., & Banks, D. (2009). After a disaster: Lessons in survey methodology from Hurricane Katrina. Population Research and Policy Review, 28(1), 67–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-008-9114-5
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.