Antioxidant defense and aging in C. elegans: Is the oxidative damage theory of aging wrong?

217Citations
Citations of this article
202Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The oxidative damage theory of aging once seemed almost proven. Yet recently the buzzards have been assembling in the blue skies above it. New challenges to the theory from work using nematode worms seem set to bring them down to peck at its bones. But is the theory really dead, or does it just need to be modified? ©2009 Landes Bioscience.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gems, D., & Doonan, R. (2009, June 1). Antioxidant defense and aging in C. elegans: Is the oxidative damage theory of aging wrong? Cell Cycle. Taylor and Francis Inc. https://doi.org/10.4161/cc.8.11.8595

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free