Skip to content

'Best practice' human resource management : perfect opportunity or dangerous illusion ?

by M. Marchington, I. Grugulis
The International Journal of Human Resource Management ()
Get full text at journal


In recent years there has been a considerable degree of interest in the notion of 'best practice' HRM, inspired at least in part by the work of Jeffrey Pfeffer. Along with other contributions from the UK and the USA, this has resulted in assertions that a particular bundle of HR practices can increase profits irrespective of organizational, industrial, or national context. In this paper, we focus on the way in which HRM is characterized in these writings, querying whether the practices which are typically assumed and put forward as 'good' may not appear quite so beneficial to workers when analysed more systematically. It is suggested that there are a number of problems with the notion of 'best practice', both in relation to the meaning of specific practices, and their consistency with each other, and the claims that this version of HRM is universally applicable. The unitarist underpinnings of this literature are also exposed. This is not to argue that HR policies and practices do not influence organizational performance but, rather, that we cannot determine this from the current literature. The 'best practice' conclusions may be attractive but the jury is still out.

Cite this document (BETA)

Readership Statistics

120 Readers on Mendeley
by Discipline
73% Business, Management and Accounting
11% Social Sciences
4% Arts and Humanities
by Academic Status
33% Student > Master
22% Student > Ph. D. Student
13% Student > Postgraduate
by Country
7% United Kingdom
2% Netherlands
2% Kenya

Sign up today - FREE

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research. Learn more

  • All your research in one place
  • Add and import papers easily
  • Access it anywhere, anytime

Start using Mendeley in seconds!

Sign up & Download

Already have an account? Sign in