Skip to content

Bystander intervention in emergencies: Diffusion of responsibility.

by Jm Darley, Bibb Latané
Journal of personality and social psychology ()
Get full text at journal


Ss overheard an epileptic seizure. They believed either that they alone heard the emergency, or that 1 or 4 unseen others were also present. As predicted the presence of other bystanders reduced the individual's feelings of personal responsibility and lowered his speed of reporting (p < .01). In groups of size 3, males reported no faster than females, and females reported no slower when the 1 other bystander was a male rather than a female. In general, personality and background measures were not predictive of helping. Bystander inaction in real-life emergencies is often explained by "apathy," "alienation," and "anomie." This experiment suggests that the explanation may lie more in the bystander's response to other observers than in his indifference to the victim.

Cite this document (BETA)

Readership Statistics

236 Readers on Mendeley
by Discipline
54% Psychology
17% Social Sciences
7% Business, Management and Accounting
by Academic Status
25% Student > Bachelor
20% Student > Ph. D. Student
16% Student > Master
by Country
4% United States
3% United Kingdom
1% Germany

Sign up today - FREE

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research. Learn more

  • All your research in one place
  • Add and import papers easily
  • Access it anywhere, anytime

Start using Mendeley in seconds!

Sign up & Download

Already have an account? Sign in