Skip to content

Calculation of vertical ground reaction force estimates during running from positional data

by Maarten F. Bobbert, Henk C. Schamhardt, Benno M. Nigg
Journal of Biomechanics ()
Get full text at journal


The purpose of this study was to calculate, as a function of time, segmental contributions to the vertical ground reaction force F(z) from positional data for the landing phase in running. In order to evaluate the accuracy of the method, time histories of the sum of the segmental contributions were compared to F(z)(t) measured directly by a force plate. The human body was modeled as a system of seven rigid segments. During running the positions of markers defining these segments were monitored using a video analysis system operating at 200 Hz. Special care was taken to minimize marker movement relative to the mass centers of segments, and low-pass cutoff frequencies of 50 Hz (markers defining leg segments) and 15-20 Hz (markers defining upper body) were used in filtering the position time histories so as to ensure that high signal frequencies were preserved. The magnitude of the high-frequency peak in F(z), also known as 'impact force peak', was estimated with errors < 10%, while the time of occurrence of the peak was estimated with errors < 5 ms. It would appear that the positional data were sufficiently accurate to be used for calculation of intersegmental forces and moments during the landing phase in running. Analysis of the segmental contributions to F(z)(t) revealed that the first peak in F(z) has its origin in the contribution of support leg segments, while its magnitude is determined primarily by the contribution of the rest of the body. These contributions could be varied independently by changing running style. It follows that if the possible relationship between 'impact force peaks' and injuries is to be investigated, or if the effects of running shoe and surface construction on these force peaks are to be evaluated, the calculation of segmental contributions to F(z)(t) is a more suitable approach than measuring only F(z) (t).

Cite this document (BETA)

Readership Statistics

110 Readers on Mendeley
by Discipline
32% Sports and Recreations
29% Engineering
15% Agricultural and Biological Sciences
by Academic Status
22% Student > Ph. D. Student
22% Researcher
16% Student > Master
by Country
5% United States
3% Germany
3% United Kingdom

Sign up today - FREE

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research. Learn more

  • All your research in one place
  • Add and import papers easily
  • Access it anywhere, anytime

Start using Mendeley in seconds!

Sign up & Download

Already have an account? Sign in