Causal Simulation Theory: An Intergrative Cognitive Neuroscience Framework for Causal Reasoning

  • Patterson R
  • Barbey A
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We review the cognitive and neural foundations of causal reasoning and assess contemporary psychological theories based on force dynamic (Barbey & Wolff, 2007; submitted), causal model (Sloman, Barbey & Hotaling, 2008), and mental model representations (Goldvarg & Johnson-Laird, 2001; Johnson-Laird & Goldvarg-Steingold, 2007). We identify limitations of each framework and propose a broader, more pluralistic theory designed to incorporate the virtues of each approach. We propose that causal reasoning depends on causal simulations of the modality-specific states underlying causal events, and draw conclusions about the importance of causal simulations for (i) representing key elements of the force dynamic, causal model, and mental model frameworks, (ii) capturing central properties these theories fail to represent (i.e., concerning perception, action, affect, and interoception), and (iii) dynamically shifting between these representations to support a broader, more comprehensive theory of causal reasoning.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Patterson, R., & Barbey, A. K. (2012). Causal Simulation Theory: An Intergrative Cognitive Neuroscience Framework for Causal Reasoning. The Neural Representation of Human Belief Systems., 76–102.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free