Skip to content

Cognitive neuroscience and the law

by Brent Garland, Paul W. Glimcher
Current Opinion in Neurobiology ()
Get full text at journal


Advances in cognitive neuroscience now allow us to use physiological techniques to measure and assess mental states under a growing set of circumstances. The implication of this growing ability has not been lost on the western legal community. If biologists can accurately measure mental state, then legal conflicts that turn on the true mental states of individuals might well be resolvable with techniques ranging from electroencephalography to functional magnetic resonance imaging. Therefore, legal practitioners have increasingly sought to employ cognitive neuroscientific methods and data as evidence to influence legal proceedings. This poses a risk, because these scientific methodologies have largely been designed and validated for experimental use only. Their subsequent use in legal proceedings is an application for which they were not intended, and for which those methods are inadequately tested. We propose that neurobiologists, who might inadvertently contribute to this situation, should be aware of how their papers will be read by the legal community and should play a more active role in educating and engaging with that community. ?? 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Cite this document (BETA)

Readership Statistics

115 Readers on Mendeley
by Discipline
39% Psychology
22% Agricultural and Biological Sciences
16% Social Sciences
by Academic Status
23% Student > Ph. D. Student
20% Researcher
14% Student > Master
by Country
4% United States
2% Spain
2% Germany

Sign up today - FREE

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research. Learn more

  • All your research in one place
  • Add and import papers easily
  • Access it anywhere, anytime

Start using Mendeley in seconds!

Sign up & Download

Already have an account? Sign in