Comment on "polynomial cointegration tests of anthropogenic impact on global warming" by Beenstock et al. (2012) – Some hazards in econometric modelling of climate change

11Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We outline six important hazards that can be encountered in econometric modelling of time-series data, and apply that analysis to demonstrate errors in the empirical modelling of climate data in Beenstock et al. (2012). We show that the claim made in Beenstock et al. (2012) as to the different degrees of integrability of CO2 and temperature is incorrect. In particular, the level of integration is not constant and not intrinsic to the process. Further, we illustrate that the measure of anthropogenic forcing in Beenstock et al. (2012), a constructed "anthropogenic anomaly", is not appropriate regardless of the time-series properties of the data. © 2013 Author(s).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pretis, F., & Hendry, D. F. (2013). Comment on “polynomial cointegration tests of anthropogenic impact on global warming” by Beenstock et al. (2012) – Some hazards in econometric modelling of climate change. Earth System Dynamics, 4(2), 375–384. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-4-375-2013

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free