Skip to content

Comparison of two modes of stress measurement: Daily hassles and uplifts versus major life events

by Allen D. Kanner, James C. Coyne, Catherine Schaefer, Richard S. Lazarus
Journal of Behavioral Medicine ()
Get full text at journal


The standard life events methodology for the prediction of psychological symptoms was compared with one focusing on relatively minor events, namely, the hassles and uplifts of everyday life. Hassles and Uplifts Scales were constructed and administered once a month for 10 consecutive months to a community sample of middle-aged adults. It was found that the Hassles Scale was a better predictor of concurrent and subsequent psychological symptoms than were the life events scores, and that the scale shared most of the variance in symptoms accounted for by life events. When the effects of life events scores were removed, hassles and symptoms remained significantly correlated. Uplifts were positively related to symptoms for women but not for men. Hassles and uplifts were also shown to be related, although only modestly so, to positive and negative affect, thus providing discriminate validation for hassles and uplifts in comparison to measures of emotion. It was concluded that the assessment of daily hassles and uplifts may be a better approach to the prediction of adaptational outcomes than the usual life events approach.

Cite this document (BETA)

Readership Statistics

379 Readers on Mendeley
by Discipline
61% Psychology
11% Social Sciences
11% Medicine and Dentistry
by Academic Status
26% Student > Ph. D. Student
17% Student > Master
14% Researcher
by Country
5% United States
2% United Kingdom
1% Australia

Sign up today - FREE

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research. Learn more

  • All your research in one place
  • Add and import papers easily
  • Access it anywhere, anytime

Start using Mendeley in seconds!

Sign up & Download

Already have an account? Sign in