Dreary state of precipitation in global models

549Citations
Citations of this article
301Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

New, definitive measures of precipitation frequency provided by CloudSat are used to assess the realism of global model precipitation. The character of liquid precipitation (defined as a combination of accumulation, frequency, and intensity) over the global oceans is significantly different from the character of liquid precipitation produced by global weather and climate models. Five different models are used in this comparison representing state-of-the-art weather prediction models, state-of-the-art climate models, and the emerging high-resolution global cloud "resolving" models. The differences between observed and modeled precipitation are larger than can be explained by observational retrieval errors or by the inherent sampling differences between observations and models. We show that the time integrated accumulations of precipitation produced by models closely match observations when globally composited. However, these models produce precipitation approximately twice as often as that observed and make rainfall far too lightly. This finding reinforces similar findings from other studies based on surface accumulated rainfall measurements. The implications of this dreary state of model depiction of the real world are discussed. Copyright 2010 by the American Geophysical Union.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Stephens, G. L., L’Ecuyer, T., Forbes, R., Gettlemen, A., Golaz, J. C., Bodas-Salcedo, A., … Haynes, J. (2010). Dreary state of precipitation in global models. Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, 115(24). https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD014532

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free