Skip to content

Economic Integration, democracy and the welfare state

by Fritz W. Scharpf
Journal of European Public Policy ()
Get full text at journal

Abstract

The article examines the dif of European welfare states in the face of European economic integration. Taking a clue from the experience of territorial sub-units in economically integrated federal nation states, the implication seems to be that economic competition impedes welfare state regulations that impose unequal burdens on capital incomes and mobile business, and that effective welfare state policies depend on the powers of central governments. By analogy, that would suggest a need for the Europeanization of social policy. At the European level, however, welfare state policies are impeded not only by the European democratic de but also by deep-rooted con of economic interest among member states, and by the widely divergent structural characteristics of national welfare states. The article examines the implications of this constellation for democratic legitimacy. In the concluding section, discussion focuses on social policy options that may still be viable at the national level, and on European-level strategies that might be able to reduce economic competition among national welfare states. The current dif culties of democratic welfare states in Europe are often ascribed to economic 'globalization', that is to the world-wide integration of markets for capital, goods and services which has eliminated national control over boundary-crossing economic transactions, and which therefore exposes national producers to world-wide competition. In fact, however, globalization in the strict sense of the word is completely realized only for speculative capital transactions. It is true that in all other areas of economic activity the intensity of international competition has increased as well, and that rms have much greater opportunities to relocate production world wide. Nevertheless, even under the liberal regimes of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) and World Trade Organization (WTO), governments have not abdicated their capacity for boundary control, and the freedom of world trade is still constrained by a wide variety of tariffs, quotas, 'voluntary' restrictions and non-tariff barriers.

Cite this document (BETA)

Readership Statistics

110 Readers on Mendeley
by Discipline
 
80% Social Sciences
 
7% Economics, Econometrics and Finance
 
5% Arts and Humanities
by Academic Status
 
32% Student > Ph. D. Student
 
18% Student > Master
 
18% Researcher
by Country
 
3% United Kingdom
 
3% Germany
 
2% Italy

Sign up today - FREE

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research. Learn more

  • All your research in one place
  • Add and import papers easily
  • Access it anywhere, anytime

Start using Mendeley in seconds!

Sign up & Download

Already have an account? Sign in