Skip to content

Evaluating research: From informed peer review to bibliometrics

by Giovanni Abramo, Ciriaco Andrea D'Angelo
Scientometrics ()
Get full text at journal


National research assessment exercises are becoming regular events in ever more countries. The present work contrasts the peer-review and bibliometrics approaches in the conduct of these exercises. The comparison is conducted in terms of the essential parameters of any measurement system: accuracy, robustness, validity, functionality, time and costs. Empirical evidence shows that for the natural and formal sciences, the biblio- metric methodology is by far preferable to peer-review. Setting up national databases of publications by individual authors, derived from Web of Science or Scopus databases, would allow much better, cheaper and more frequent national research assessments.

Cite this document (BETA)

Authors on Mendeley

Readership Statistics

103 Readers on Mendeley
by Discipline
37% Social Sciences
17% Computer Science
10% Business, Management and Accounting
by Academic Status
20% Librarian
17% Researcher
12% Student > Master
by Country
6% Netherlands
4% United States
4% Spain

Sign up today - FREE

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research. Learn more

  • All your research in one place
  • Add and import papers easily
  • Access it anywhere, anytime

Start using Mendeley in seconds!

Sign up & Download

Already have an account? Sign in