Evaluating research: from informed peer review to bibliometrics

by Giovanni Abramo, Ciriaco Andrea D’Angelo
Scientometrics ()


National research assessment exercises are becoming regular events in ever more countries. The present work contrasts the peer-review and bibliometrics approaches in the conduct of these exercises. The comparison is conducted in terms of the essential parameters of any measurement system: accuracy, robustness, validity, functionality, time and costs. Empirical evidence shows that for the natural and formal sciences, the bibliometric methodology is by far preferable to peer-review. Setting up national databases of publications by individual authors, derived from Web of Science or Scopus databases, would allow much better, cheaper and more frequent national research assessments.

Cite this document (BETA)

Readership Statistics

67 Readers on Mendeley
by Discipline
by Academic Status
16% Ph.D. Student
16% Librarian
15% Student (Master)
by Country
12% Netherlands
4% United States
4% Spain

Sign up today - FREE

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research. Learn more

  • All your research in one place
  • Add and import papers easily
  • Access it anywhere, anytime

Start using Mendeley in seconds!

Sign up & Download

Already have an account? Sign in