Skip to content

An evaluation of the reliability of time sampling versus continuous observation data collection

by Robert C. Klesges, Joan Woolfrey, James Vollmer
Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry ()
Get full text at journal


Thirty (10 male, 20 female) children, ages 41 to 71 months, were observed simultaneously in a freeplay setting by two observers using a validated assessment of physical activity in children (i.e. the FATS). One observer utilized a whole interval time sampling method of data recording and the second observer used a hand-held computer and continuously entered observations whenever a child's activity level changed, while the computer simultaneously calculated elapsed time (in tenths of seconds) spent in each behavioral category. Overall activity scores generated by the two approaches correlated 0.90 although the time sampling method produced lower estimates of physical activity. It is concluded that whole interval time sampling is a reliable cost-effective method of assessing physical activity levels in children and may be preferable to the continuous computer-assisted approach that was utilized. ?? 1985.

Cite this document (BETA)

Readership Statistics

4 Readers on Mendeley
by Discipline
50% Psychology
50% Social Sciences
by Academic Status
50% Student > Master
25% Researcher
25% Student > Doctoral Student
by Country
25% United States

Sign up today - FREE

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research. Learn more

  • All your research in one place
  • Add and import papers easily
  • Access it anywhere, anytime

Start using Mendeley in seconds!

Sign up & Download

Already have an account? Sign in