A forensics of the mind

3Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This essay discusses the yoked history of witnessing in science and the law and examines the history of attempts, over the past century, to use science to improve the surety of witness testimony. It examines some of these projects, particularly in the 1960s and 1970s. The essay argues that modem psychology offers a particularly problematic form of expertise because its focus is a task central to the jury's mandate, the evaluation of a witness and his or her testimony. It concludes that a key feature of modern disputes over the legal relevance of psychological techniques is not the quality or character of the expertise being offered to the court but, rather, the question of whether expertise is needed at all and under what circumstances it should impinge on the jury's decision making. © 2007 by The History of Science Society. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Winter, A. (2007). A forensics of the mind. ISIS, 98(2), 332–343. https://doi.org/10.1086/518193

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free