Skip to content

Generating and generalizing knowledge about psychotherapy from pragmatic case studies

by Tracy D Eells
Pragmatic Case Studies in Psychotherapy ()
Get full text at journal


An epistemological case is made for how single subject psychotherapy research provides unique and untapped opportunities for generating and generalizing scientific knowledge about psychotherapy. The epistemological claim asserts that it is essential that problem and method be aligned in psychotherapy research. Examples of misalignment in experimental and correlational contexts are given and their consequences discussed. Both Molenaar and Valsiner’s (2005) genetic metaphor of phenotypes and genotypes and Lewin’s (1931) concept of Aristotelian and Galileian thinking provides further epistemological grounds for the value of single subject research. Several suggestions are made for how to reconcile the epistemological problems discussed. Finally, examples are given of how a database generated by the PCSP journal process might serve as a tool to generate and generalize psychotherapy knowledge.

Cite this document (BETA)

Readership Statistics

23 Readers on Mendeley
by Discipline
87% Psychology
9% Arts and Humanities
4% Social Sciences
by Academic Status
13% Researcher
13% Professor > Associate Professor
13% Student > Bachelor
by Country
4% Spain
4% Chile
4% United States

Sign up today - FREE

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research. Learn more

  • All your research in one place
  • Add and import papers easily
  • Access it anywhere, anytime

Start using Mendeley in seconds!

Sign up & Download

Already have an account? Sign in