Skip to main content
ArticleOPEN ACCESS

H-index, mentoring-index, highly-cited and highly-accessed: How to evaluate scientists?

Retrovirology
DOI: 10.1186/1742-4690-5-106
27Citations
Citations of this article
43Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

How best to evaluate scientists within a peer group is a difficult task. This editorial discusses the use of the H-index and total citations. It also raises the consideration of a mentoring-index and the value of understanding the frequency that a published paper is accessed by readers. © 2008 Jeang; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jeang, K. T. (2008, November 25). H-index, mentoring-index, highly-cited and highly-accessed: How to evaluate scientists? Retrovirology. https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-4690-5-106

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free