Skip to content

From moral to legal judgment: The influence of normative context in lawyers and other academics

by Stephan Schleim, Tade M. Spranger, Susanne Erk, Henrik Walter
Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience ()
Get full text at journal


Various kinds of normative judgments are an integral part of everyday life. We extended the scrutiny of social cognitive neuroscience into the domain of legal decisions, investigating two groups, lawyers and other academics, during moral and legal decision-making. While we found activation of brain areas comprising the so-called 'moral brain' in both conditions, there was stronger activation in the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and middle temporal gyrus particularly when subjects made legal decisions, suggesting that these were made in respect to more explicit rules and demanded more complex semantic processing. Comparing both groups, our data show that behaviorally lawyers conceived themselves as emotionally less involved during normative decision-making in general. A group × condition interaction in the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex suggests a modulation of normative decision-making by attention based on subjects' normative expertise.

Cite this document (BETA)

Authors on Mendeley

Readership Statistics

55 Readers on Mendeley
by Discipline
56% Psychology
13% Medicine and Dentistry
13% Social Sciences
by Academic Status
31% Student > Ph. D. Student
22% Researcher
11% Student > Doctoral Student
by Country
9% Germany
4% United States
2% Italy

Sign up today - FREE

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research. Learn more

  • All your research in one place
  • Add and import papers easily
  • Access it anywhere, anytime

Start using Mendeley in seconds!

Sign up & Download

Already have an account? Sign in