Open access to scientific publications The good, the bad, and the ugly

  • Beaudouin-Lafon M
ISSN: 00010782
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Open Access is a valuable goal, but the scientific community is overly naive about the whole business of scientific publishing. Societies and nonprofit organizations need to continue to lead the way to improve the dissemination of research results, but the scientific community at large must support them against the business-centric views of commercial publishers. Author fees are not a solution. Worse, they jeopardize the ecological balance of the research incentive structure. Finally, nonprofit publishers should take advantage of their unique position to experiment with sustainable evolutions of their publishing models.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Beaudouin-Lafon, M. (2010). Open access to scientific publications The good, the bad, and the ugly. Communications of the ACM, 53, 32–34. Retrieved from https://www.lri.fr/~mbl/pdf/cacm-openaccess-feb10.pdf

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free