Oral premedication for paediatric ambulatory anaesthesia: a comparison of midazolam and ketamine

74Citations
Citations of this article
74Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

To compare the clinical characteristics of two oral premedicants, midazolam and ketamine, 40 healthy children, one to six years of age, who were scheduled for ambulatory dental surgery, were assigned to receive either oral midazolam 0.5 mg · kg-1 or oral ketamine 5.0 mg · kg-1 in a double-blind, randomized study. Sedation and anxiolysis scores before induction, cooperation at induction of anaesthesia and recovery times and complications were assessed. We found that both drugs effectively sedated the children within 20 min of administration. Although sedated, 10% of the children in the midazolam group and 20% of those in the ketamine group became tearful on separation from their parents and 20% of those in the midazolam group and 35% of those in the ketamine group became tearful when the facemask was applied. No important side effects were attributable to either premedication. The time until the children were fit for discharge from the hospital after midazolam was approximately 20 min less than after ketamine. In conclusion, midazolam and ketamine offer similar clinical characteristics when used as oral premedications for children undergoing ambulatory surgery, although the time to discharge from hospital may be more rapid after midazolam than after ketamine. © 1994 Canadian Anesthesiologists.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Alderson, P. J., & Lerman, J. (1994). Oral premedication for paediatric ambulatory anaesthesia: a comparison of midazolam and ketamine. Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia, 41(3), 221–226. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03009834

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free