Procuring Commodities: First-price sealed-bid or English auctions?

18Citations
Citations of this article
46Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

We use laboratory experiments to examine the relative performance of the English auction (EA) and the first-price sealed-bid auction (FPA) when procuring a commodity. The mean and variance of prices are lower in the FPA than in the EA. Bids and prices in the EA agree with game-theoretic predictions, but they do not agree in the FPA. To resolve these deviations found in the FPA, we introduce a mixture model with three bidding rules: constant absolute markup, constant percentage markup, and strategic best response. A dynamic specification in which bidders can switch strategies as they gain experience is estimated as a hidden Markov model. Initially, about three quarters of the subjects are strategic bidders, but over time, the number of strategic bidders falls to below 65%. There is a corresponding growth in those who use the constant absolute markup rule. © 2012 INFORMS.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Shachat, J., & Wei, L. (2012). Procuring Commodities: First-price sealed-bid or English auctions? Marketing Science, 31(2), 317–333. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1120.0704

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free