Psychological motives and political orientation--The left, the right, and the rigid: Comment on Jost et al. (2003).

  • Jeff G
  • Eva J
ISSN: 1939-1455
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Presenting an impressive model based on a large body of evidence, J. T. Jost, J. Glaser, A.W. Kruglanski, and F. J. Sulloway (2003) proposed that political conservatism uniquely serves epistemic, existential, and ideological needs driven by fears and uncertainties. The authors offer an alternative view based on conceptual considerations, historical events, features of communist ideology and practice, and additional social science research not reviewed by Jost et al. (2003). First, the authors take issue with Jost et al.'s (2003) description of the two core components of political conservatism. Second, they propose that the motives in the model are equally well served by rigid adherence to any extreme ideology regardless of whether it is right wing or left wing. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved). (journal abstract)

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jeff, G., & Eva, J. (2003). Psychological motives and political orientation--The left, the right, and the rigid: Comment on Jost et al. (2003). Psychological Bulletin, 129(3), 376–382. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=2003-00782-004&site=ehost-live&scope=site jeff@u.arizona.edu

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free