Skip to content

Rate my research dot com: Measuring what we value, and valuing what we measure

by J Peters, R Marsh
Management Decision ()
Get full text at journal


Purpose - This paper aims to question the dominance of citation metrics in the evaluation of the impact of research and prompt debate on how to evaluate impact in different contexts. Design/methodology/approach - The paper takes the form of a viewpoint and review of how metrics are used currently and presents recommendations for change. Findings - Whilst recognising the continued relevance and importance of citation as a measure of impact, the paper highlights how this measure overshadows all other types of impact (on practice, teaching, public policy, society) and, in turn, has the potential to distort academic research practice. Research limitations/implications - Additional research should follow to identify other methods of evaluating research impact with a specific emphasis on the development of usage metrics. Practical implications - The paper calls on all parties within the research dissemination process (academics, publishers, funding bodies) to formulate new ways of evaluating research. Originality/value - The paper challenges current thinking on how to evaluate research and makes a number of recommendations, specifically around article usage. © Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

Author-supplied keywords

Cite this document (BETA)

Readership Statistics

17 Readers on Mendeley
by Discipline
53% Business, Management and Accounting
18% Computer Science
12% Social Sciences
by Academic Status
18% Student > Ph. D. Student
18% Student > Master
12% Professor > Associate Professor
by Country
6% Portugal
6% Zambia
6% Netherlands

Sign up today - FREE

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research. Learn more

  • All your research in one place
  • Add and import papers easily
  • Access it anywhere, anytime

Start using Mendeley in seconds!

Sign up & Download

Already have an account? Sign in