How relevant is an expert evaluation of user experience based on a psychological needs-driven approach?

16Citations
Citations of this article
82Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Many methods and tools have been proposed to assess the User Experience (UX) of interactive systems. However, while researchers have empirically studied the relevance and validity of several UX evaluation methods, few studies only have explored expert-based evaluation methods for the assessment of UX. If experts are able to assess something as complex and inherently subjective as UX, how they conduct such an evaluation and what criteria they rely on, thus remain open questions. In the present paper we report on 33 UX experts performing a UX evaluation on 4 interactive systems. We provided the experts with UX Cards, a tool based on a psychological-needs driven approach, developed to support UX Design and Evaluation. Results are encouraging and show that UX experts encountered no major issues to conduct a UX evaluation. However, significant differences exist between individual elements that experts have reported on and the overall assessment they made of the systems. Copyright 2014 ACM.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lallemand, C., Koenig, V., & Gronier, G. (2014). How relevant is an expert evaluation of user experience based on a psychological needs-driven approach? In Proceedings of the NordiCHI 2014: The 8th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Fun, Fast, Foundational (pp. 11–20). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/2639189.2639214

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free