Skip to content

Supporting valid interpretations of learning progression level diagnoses

by Jeffrey T. Steedle, Richard J. Shavelson
Journal of Research in Science Teaching ()
Get full text at journal


Assessments associated with learning progressions are designed to provide diagnostic information about the level and nature of student understanding. Valid interpretations of such diagnoses are only possible when students consistently express the ideas associated with a single learning progression level. Latent class analysis was employed to evaluate whether patterns of expected responses to diagnostic multiple-choice items afforded valid interpretations of learning progression level diagnoses. Results indicated that students with scientifically accurate understanding of the forces acting on an object with constant speed usually reasoned systematically across items, but many other students did not. Consequently, interpretations of learning progression level diagnoses on a proposed learning progression would often be invalid. Analyses of this sort would be useful in developing and validating future learning progressions

Cite this document (BETA)

Readership Statistics

96 Readers on Mendeley
by Discipline
75% Social Sciences
6% Physics and Astronomy
5% Psychology
by Academic Status
34% Student > Ph. D. Student
20% Researcher
16% Professor > Associate Professor
by Country
9% United States
1% Switzerland
1% United Kingdom

Sign up today - FREE

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research. Learn more

  • All your research in one place
  • Add and import papers easily
  • Access it anywhere, anytime

Start using Mendeley in seconds!

Sign up & Download

Already have an account? Sign in