Skip to content

Tracking citations and altmetrics for research data: Challenges and opportunities

by Stacy Konkiel
Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology ()
Get full text at journal


Methods for determining research quality have long been debated but with little lasting agreement on standards, leading to the emergence of alternative metrics. Altmetrics are a useful supplement to traditional citation metrics, reflecting a variety of measurement points that give different perspectives on how a dataset is used and by whom. A positive development is the integration of a number of research datasets into the ISI Data Citation Index,making datasets searchable and linking them to published articles. Yet access to data resources and tracking the resulting altmetrics depend on specific qualities of the datasets and the systems where they are archived. Though research on altmetrics use is growing, the lack of standardization across datasets and system architecture undermines its generalizability.Without some standards, stakeholders’ adoption of altmetrics will be limited. KEYWORDS

Cite this document (BETA)

Authors on Mendeley

Readership Statistics

137 Readers on Mendeley
by Discipline
42% Social Sciences
28% Computer Science
7% Arts and Humanities
by Academic Status
43% Librarian
10% Researcher
9% Student > Ph. D. Student
by Country
12% United States
5% Spain
3% Netherlands

Sign up today - FREE

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research. Learn more

  • All your research in one place
  • Add and import papers easily
  • Access it anywhere, anytime

Start using Mendeley in seconds!

Sign up & Download

Already have an account? Sign in