Skip to content

Understanding interaction models: Improving empirical analyses

by Thomas Brambor, William Roberts Clark, Matt Golder
Political Analysis ()
Get full text at journal


Multiplicative interaction models are common in the quantitative political science literature. This is so for good reason. Institutional arguments frequently imply that the relationship between political inputs and outcomes varies depending on the institutional context. Models of strategic interaction typically produce conditional hypotheses as well. Although conditional hypotheses are ubiquitous in political science and multiplicative interaction models have been found to capture their intuition quite well, a survey of the top three political science journals from 1998 to 2002 suggests that the execution of these models is often flawed and inferential errors are common. We believe that considerable progress in our understanding of the political world can occur if scholars follow the simple checklist of dos and don'ts for using multiplicative interaction models presented in this article. Only 10% of the articles in our survey followed the checklist.

Cite this document (BETA)

Readership Statistics

8730 Readers on Mendeley
by Discipline
93% Social Sciences
2% Economics, Econometrics and Finance
2% Business, Management and Accounting
by Academic Status
24% Student > Master
21% Student > Ph. D. Student
16% Student > Bachelor
by Country
2% United States
1% United Kingdom
1% Spain

Sign up today - FREE

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research. Learn more

  • All your research in one place
  • Add and import papers easily
  • Access it anywhere, anytime

Start using Mendeley in seconds!

Sign up & Download

Already have an account? Sign in