Warm-up rates during arousal from torpor in heterothermic mammals: physiological correlates and a comparison with heterothermic insects

26Citations
Citations of this article
44Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This study examines the relationship between warm-up rate, body mass, metabolic rate, thermal conductance and normothermic body temperature in heterothermic mammals during arousal from torpor. Predictions based on the assumption that the energetic cost of arousal has been minimised are tested using data for 35 species. The observation that across-species warm-up rate correlates negatively with body mass is confirmed using a comparative technique which removes confounding effects due to the non-independence of species data due to shared common ancestry. Mean warm-up rate during arousal correlates negatively with basal metabolic rate and positively with the temperature difference through which the animal warms, having controlled for other factors. These results suggest that selection has operated to minimise the overall energetic, cost of warm-up. In contrast, peak warm-up rate during arousal correlates positively with peak metabolic rate during arousal, and negatively with thermal conductance, when body mass has been taken into account. These results suggest that peak warm-up rate is more sensitive to the fundamental processes of heat generation and loss. Although heterothermic marsupials have lower normothermic body temperatures and basal metabolic rates, marsupials and heterothermic eutherian mammals do not differ systematically in warm-up rate. Pre-flight warm-up rates in one group of endothermic insects, the bees, are significantly higher than predictions based on rates of arousal of a mammal of the same body mass. © 1992 Springer-Verlag.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Stone, G. N., & Purvis, A. (1992). Warm-up rates during arousal from torpor in heterothermic mammals: physiological correlates and a comparison with heterothermic insects. Journal of Comparative Physiology B, 162(3), 284–295. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00357536

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free