Antithrombotic Dilemmas after Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Watchman Device Placement

  • Ahuja T
  • Murphy S
  • Sartori D
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Antithrombotic therapy for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) has dramatically shifted from warfarin, a vitamin K antagonist, to the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) such as dabigatran, apixaban, and rivaroxaban. In patients with contraindications to oral anticoagulation, left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) devices, such as the Watchman™ device, may be considered; however, temporary postimplantation antithrombotic therapy is still a recommended practice. We present a case of complex antithrombotic management, post LAAO device implantation, designed to avoid drug interactions with concomitant rifampin use and remained necessary secondary to subsequent device leak. This case highlights the challenges of antithrombotic therapy post LAAO device placement in a complex, but representative, patient.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ahuja, T., Murphy, S., & Sartori, D. J. (2019). Antithrombotic Dilemmas after Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Watchman Device Placement. Case Reports in Cardiology, 2019, 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/5247105

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free