Identidad social en amartya sen: Vinculando libertad y responsabilidad en democracia

1Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Social identity is plural, ambiguous, chosen, neither inherited nor merely discovered, and coexists harmoniously with other identities (Sen, 2001, p. 319). Identities related to capabilities, an aspect of freedom understood as the individual’s willingness to choose from among the substantive opportunities that exist (Sen, 2004, p. 520). At present, some identities are being constructed and reinforced, but others are being weakened, such as those relating to work. This text insists on the need to think about the connection between identity, freedom and responsibility. Identity without freedom is a chimera, but it is also impossible for identity and freedom to be present without responsibility, because identity is an option that is chosen, and as an action, needs both individual responsibility as well as responsibility to others. This enables the substantive opportunities that make it effective. This work is relevant because the existing literature does not stop to analyse these relationships explicitly.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Carvajal Muñoz, M. R. (2015). Identidad social en amartya sen: Vinculando libertad y responsabilidad en democracia. Arbor, 191(775). https://doi.org/10.3989/arbor.2015.775n5008

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free