Comparison of effects of antimicrobial interventions on multidrug-resistant Salmonella, susceptible Salmonella, and Escherichia coll O157:H7

35Citations
Citations of this article
48Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Several strains of Salmonella have been identified as resistant to multiple antibiotics. What is not known is whether strains possessing multidrug resistance properties also have the ability to resist the killing effects of the antimicrobial interventions used in beef processing. The research project described herein was designed to determine whether antimicrobial interventions currently in place in beef processing facilities are adequate for reducing the foodborne pathogen loads on beef carcass surfaces contaminated with multidrug-resistant (MDR) Salmonella. The data presented here indicate that MDR Salmonella is reduced at least as effectively as are Escherichia coli O157:H7 and susceptible Salmonella when treated with antimicrobial interventions currently in use at most U.S. beef processing plants. The E. coli O157:H7 strains used in this study were divided into two groups, strains that have a genetic polymorphism associated with human disease and strains not typically found to cause human disease. No differences were detected in the abilities of these two strain types to survive antimicrobial interventions. These results indicate that neither the drug resistance status of a particular Salmonella strain nor the likelihood that a particular E. coli O157:H7 strain will cause human illness influences the antimicrobial efficacy of the interventions utilized by the modern beef processing plants.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Arthur, T. M., Kalchayanand, N., Bosilevac, J. M., Brichta-Harhay, D. M., Shackelford, S. D., Bono, J. L., … Koohmaraie, M. (2008). Comparison of effects of antimicrobial interventions on multidrug-resistant Salmonella, susceptible Salmonella, and Escherichia coll O157:H7. Journal of Food Protection, 71(11), 2177–2181. https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X-71.11.2177

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free