Treatment of Kümmell's disease with sequential infusion of bone cement: A retrospective study

5Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) is an effective method for the treatment of neurologically intact Kümmell's disease, but bone cement leakage during surgery is a problem that deserves attention. AIM: To reduce bone cement leakage and evaluate the effect of the sequential infusion of bone cement during PVP for the treatment of stage I or II Kümmell's disease. METHODS: Patients with Kümmell's disease treated in our hospital from September 2015 to September 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria were divided into two groups: Traditional single infusion and sequential infusion (SI). The visual analog scale (VAS) and Oswestry disability index (ODI) were evaluated and compared, and duration of operation, bone cement content and complications were recorded. RESULTS: Forty-five patients were included in this study; there were 24 in the traditional single infusion group and 21 in the SI group. The VAS and ODI were significantly different for both groups when compared pre- and postoperatively, whereas the differences between 1 wk postoperatively and at the final follow-up were not statistically. When the VAS and ODI of the two groups were compared, there were no significant differences at any time point. The leakage rate of bone cement was significantly lower in the SI group (14.3%, 3 of 21) than that in the traditional single infusion group (41.7%, 10 of 24). CONCLUSION: SI in unipedicular PVP is a safe and effective procedure for neurologically intact Kümmell's disease, and this technique could decrease the incidence of bone cement leakage.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zhang, X., Yang, H. L., Liu, H. P., Zhou, B., & Li, Y. C. (2020). Treatment of Kümmell’s disease with sequential infusion of bone cement: A retrospective study. World Journal of Clinical Cases, 8(23), 5887–5893. https://doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v8.i23.5887

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free