Association between physiological stress and skin temperature response after a half marathon

21Citations
Citations of this article
59Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to determine the association between skin temperature response and the physiological stress after a half marathon. Approach: Seventeen runners were measured 48 h before, 24 h before, 24 h after and 48 h after completing a half marathon. The measurements on each day of testing included blood markers (creatine kinase [CK] and glutamate oxaloacetate transaminase [GOT]), perception of pain and fatigue (using a visual analogue scale), skin temperature (using infrared thermography), and jump performance (using countermovement jump test). Main results: CK (p < 0.001 and ES = 2.1), GOT (p = 0.04 and ES = 1.3), and perception of fatigue and pain (p < 0.001 and ES > 1.0) increased 24 h after the half marathon, whereas jump performance decreased (p < 0.01 and ES = 0.4). No increase of skin temperature was observed in the tests after the competition and no regression model was able to predict physiological stress using skin temperature. Only a bivariate correlation was observed between the 24 h variation (pre-24 h) of CK and the skin temperature of the posterior upper limb (p = 0.04 and r = 0.5), and between the 48 h variation (pre-48 h) of pain perceived and the skin temperature of the knee (p < 0.01 and r = 0.6). Significance: In conclusion, follow-up on basal skin temperatures does not seem to be an adequate method to detect physiological stress after a half marathon. In line with the observed results, we recommend caution when interpreting peaks in basal skin temperature in field sports assessments.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pérez-Guarner, A., Priego-Quesada, J. I., Oficial-Casado, F., Cibrián Ortiz De Anda, R. M., Carpes, F. P., & Palmer, R. S. (2019). Association between physiological stress and skin temperature response after a half marathon. Physiological Measurement, 40(3). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6579/ab0fdc

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free