Comparing the performance of Teflon and quartz membrane filters collecting atmospheric PM: Influence of atmospheric water

44Citations
Citations of this article
85Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Mass concentration and chemical composition of PM10 and PM2.5 was measured during eight one-month winter and summer field studies carried out in the Po Valley (Northern Italy). PM was daily collected on Teflon (T) and on quartz (Q) filters set side-by-side. During the summer periods the differences between the mass concentrations measured on the two filters (T-Q) were within the range of experimental error, while statistically significant positive differences were detected during the winter periods. The sum of the chemical analyses (elements, ions, elemental and organic carbon) allowed the achievement of satisfactory mass closure during the summer periods, while unaccounted masses of the order of 10-20% of the PM mass measured on Teflon were detected during the winter periods. Unaccounted mass and T-Q differences increased during periods of high atmospheric stability, when the ammonium nitrate concentration also increased rapidly. Unaccounted masses and T-Q differences can be attributed to PM-bound and PM-adsorbed water. © Taiwan Association for Aerosol Research.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Perrino, C., Canepari, S., & Catrambone, M. (2013). Comparing the performance of Teflon and quartz membrane filters collecting atmospheric PM: Influence of atmospheric water. Aerosol and Air Quality Research, 13(1), 137–147. https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2012.07.0167

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free