Sexual assault during the time of gulf war I: A cross-sectional survey of U.S. service men who later applied for department of veterans affairs PTSD disability benefits

19Citations
Citations of this article
81Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

Objectives: To estimate the cumulative incidence of sexual assault during the time of Gulf War I among male Gulf War I Veterans who later applied for Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) post-traumatic stress disorder disability benefits and to identify potential risk and protective factors for sexual assault within the population. Method: Mailed, national, cross-sectional survey supplemented with VA administrative and clinical data. Results: Of 2,415 Veterans sampled, 1,700 (70%) responded. After adjusting for nonignorable missing data, the cumulative incidence of sexual assault during Gulf War I in this population ranged from 18% [95% confidence intervals (CI): 5.0%–51.9%] to 21% (95% CI: 20.0–22.0). Deployment was not associated with sexual assault [Odds Ratio (OR), 0.96; 95% CI: 0.75– 1.23], but combat exposure was (OR, 1.80; 95% CI: 1.52–2.10). Other correlates of sexual assault within the population included working in a unit with greater tolerance of sexual harassment (OR, 1.80; 95% CI: 1.52–2.10) and being exposed to more sexual identity challenges (OR, 1.76; 95% CI: 1.55–2.00). Conclusions: The 9-month cumulative incidence of sexual assault in this particular population exceeded the lifetime cumulative incidence of sexual assault in U.S. civilian women. Although Persian Gulf deployment was not associated with sexual assault in this population, combat exposure was.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Murdoch, M., Polusny, M. A., Street, A., Noorbaloochi, S., Simon, A. B., Bangerter, A., … Voller, E. (2015). Sexual assault during the time of gulf war I: A cross-sectional survey of U.S. service men who later applied for department of veterans affairs PTSD disability benefits. Military Medicine, 179(3), 285–293. https://doi.org/10.7205/MILMED-D-12-00513

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free